{"id":437,"date":"2013-04-05T17:47:44","date_gmt":"2013-04-05T15:47:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/?p=437"},"modified":"2013-04-05T19:01:54","modified_gmt":"2013-04-05T17:01:54","slug":"resumee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/2013\/04\/05\/resumee\/","title":{"rendered":"Resumee\/ my scientific work"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For the sake of learning from old mistakes and also some selfsupport, I printed out all my old presentations, papers, and everything that either went on print or got a mark or feedback of some sort.<\/p>\n<p>I was quite astonished I only wrote 8 papers- with 7 papers in 3 years (2009-2012)- and held at least 20 presentations in 6 years (2006-2012). Per annum, that makes about 1 paper and 3 presentations starting from 2006 where I began my studies.<\/p>\n<p>What also astonished me is that I always thought my strenght really were the <strong>presentations<\/strong>. But most of those (including the handouts) were awful, most PPP were made last-minute in the night before, and from my point of view as of today, really not convincing although I remember I put <em>a lot of effort<\/em> in preparations.<br \/>\nMy typical presentation took about a <em>month<\/em> of preparation where I would read something on topic <em>nearly every day<\/em> for 2 weeks because I was so excited about it. Then I paused for a week where I did nothing but surfing on facebook, having a bad conscience and pondering about the questions I stumbled upon in my research. A few days before I had to hold the presentation, my bad conscience became almost unbearable and I was procrastinating like a maniac. Only one or two days left to Day X, I did the handout- when I managed that, I was feeling like the best prepared student in the world. Sometimes I did not even manage to do that but did the PPP and the handout in one rush.<br \/>\nThe PPP I almost exclusively did the night before, in a nightshift. I remember being tired during almost all my presentation, and often did not sleep at all. Sometimes I had a &#8222;break through moment&#8220; just that night, which pushed me further and made me feel I my reasearch was fruitful and the work payed off. I also was super excited every time, and eager to present my results. I also remember I often had the feeling nobody else found the topic I talked about as exciting as I did, and maybe even the professor did not get my point. My presentation marks, at least the ones I remember, weren&#8217;t really perfect. Sometimes I got the best mark, but often enough, it was average or even below. Often, was extremely disappointed when the show was finally over and I was alone again.<br \/>\nNevertheless, during all the years, I was convinced my strenght really were those presentations and talking in front of others. I took every chance I had, and I was very positive until the moment it was over.<br \/>\nNow I realize, that this is not true and the image of myself I created and believed in was quite wrong. I do see progress in my presentation work, although it is quite little and the &#8222;input stress\/output feedback&#8220; bill really <em>never<\/em> payed off in my favor. The only good thing I have to say is that I realized even back in middle school that group work wasn&#8217;t my cuppa so I avoided that completely whenever possible- with only less a handful of exceptions which all failed miserably.<\/p>\n<p>When taking a look at my <strong>papers<\/strong>, on the other hand, a complete different picture appears. I took my time before I started writing stuff down and hand it in- I was incredibly insecure and ashamed of my work from the very first day, and I also started off with a bad experience. So, I studied for about three years until I finally decided I had to start writing papers or else I&#8217;ll never get a grade. I also felt confident enough to give it a try.<\/p>\n<p>My very first paper in 2006 was <em>de jure<\/em><strong> not a paper<\/strong><em>.<\/em> It was just a few pages describing a work of art I had to do for one of the basic courses in Euro-American Art History. The task was to describe a picture the prof gave to us. I felt I could easily do that because in art class back in school, I got straight A&#8217;s and nothing else, so I wasn&#8217;t afraid and just started writing like I used to do in school. I got a below-average mark and my selfconscience was shattered. When I read it now, it&#8217;s kinda ridicolous and of course, not scientific at all. The prof was super nice and calmly explained to me her critic and gave me tips on how to improve. I remember the talk was quite long, and when I went home, I was extremely disappointed of myself. I also feared that this below-average mark would destroy my hope for a very good bachelor degree in the end, since every mark counts in. This led to my fear of <em>handing in papers<\/em>, I guess.<br \/>\nAfter that, three years later, I took a course on Japanese Woodcut Printing focussing on prints of Kabuki actors (those are called <em>yakusha-e<\/em>). The prof said she wanted to gather a little brochure on the Kabuki Juhachiban (&#8222;18 Grand Plays of Kabuki theatre&#8220;) and thus, we were each given one of those 18. I remember I did not have any clue about the Juhachiban or Kabuki at all at that point, and merely picked Kan U because I kinda liked the sound. The prof said to me, &#8220; Oh, watch out, this is the most difficult one to gather information because it&#8217;s the most unusual one- do you still want to take that one?&#8220;- so I guess she touched my weak spot being my pride, and I insisted on taking Kan U. The task was to write a <em>one-pager<\/em>, just giving a quick overview about the play, main theme, figure and providing one randomly chosen yakusha-e of that Juhachiban play. So again, this was technically <strong>not a paper<\/strong>. I worked 6 months on the paper, and it turned out 14 pages. My prof did not refuse it and was quite thrilled. She praised me and I got the best mark. The brochure never went on print or something, but there is that little free-to-copy folder now sitting in our library in the handset section.<br \/>\nI did 6 pages for a book and my first article in print after that, while at the same time re-gaining trust in my own work and self again. For several times, I proved to myself: I <em>could<\/em> do better than below-average! I still feel proud about everything I did after that very first blooper, because I am convinced I <em>can<\/em> work scientifically and I also <em>enjoy<\/em> it, and I don&#8217;t think there is any point in hiding those facts. So I guess you could say I really shyed away from taking the task of handing in a standard paper, and still was very, very insecure.<\/p>\n<p>My <strong>very first standart paper<\/strong> then came finally in 2010. This is mere 3 years ago! It was 14 pages (apprendix and tables +5 pages), and I did it for a course I took one year before I handed in the paper. You could say my research took half a year, or maybe a year if you count the time I took the course in. The prof was the same as the one where I handed in the one about Kan U, and I considered it safe play since she was already convinced I did good work before I even wrote down the first word. The paper was touching the yakusha-e subject again, but this time, I focussed on the tiny censor&#8217;s seals. She said I should give a general overview on the subject and write something like a wiki article, kinda sorting the information I gathered and just putting it down in one place for good. I thought this might not be enough. I remember I struggled quite a lot and put endless hours in research. Not only I xeroxed all the metres of book I gathered to collect it in a huge folder, but I also dragged that huge folder with me when I went on vacation with my boyfriend to Egypt. So I sat there on the sundeck of a cruising boat in Egypt, surrounded by opportunities for leisure, reading in that folder, cursing probably all the authors I read and also myself. But not enough- since I booked vacations long ago, and did not manage to finish all in Egypt, I again took that (now quite colourful and newly organized) folder <em>a second time with me<\/em> when I went off for a second holiday a few weeks later, to the UK. Luckily, I was visiting friends of my parents, where my dad&#8217;s old friend became a writer\/journalist of some sort. So the family was probably used to the war I fought with myself, and quiet people angrily staring at screens and typing in the living-room. Since I was provided with fresh air, a dog, lush green english meadows around to stroll in, and plenty of milk-tea, the anger soon vanished and I felt very productive. During the week I stayed, I managed to finish my paper early with even some time left for real vacation. I did a very good job, got a very good mark, and I can still read that paper without shame, heck, I even used it to check a few things later since I provided useful tables which made dating the seals real easy. More than that, I had a &#8222;beak-through&#8220; moment and made some remarks that I would still consider genuine scientific work. Again, I really did accomplish something.<br \/>\nComing to a conclusion, the effort I took for my papers <em>did<\/em> pay off well, but I (still) do not see that. Although I was and still am proud of the results- I always felt very ashamed about all my papers, for several reasons.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I still don&#8217;t think I write <em>well<\/em> enough, or got a special talent for writing. I tend to shift styles. Writing it down merely a tool for sharing my ideas with others, at least that&#8217;s what I think. It just happens to be the only one where I more likely can develop a point of view, build up an argumentation, and sometimes even get it through to others.<\/li>\n<li>It always was <em>such a struggle<\/em>, with me sweating blood and ink, from the moment I said, &#8222;yeah I&#8217;m gonna write about that, that is so awesome&#8220; to the moment I finally hand it in.<\/li>\n<li>It takes me a <em>long<\/em> time to get to a point where I think the paper is &#8222;ready and worthy&#8220; to hand it in.<\/li>\n<li>Also, I never worked less than 6 months (except the very first try) on one paper. This is such a <em>long<\/em> time! I&#8217;m so <em>slow<\/em>!<\/li>\n<li>I never handed in a paper <em>in time<\/em>. I feel and felt ashamed about that. I feel like a traitor to others, since I <em>still<\/em> got excellent marks.<\/li>\n<li>When I compare my work flow to other students (yeah I know I shouldn&#8217;t but what can I do, the profs are also encouraging that <em>competition<\/em>, which I hate), I feel awkward and slow.<\/li>\n<li>Even though I (and some profs) know my papers are exceptionally good, I feel that I cannot share my papers or even my work in progress with other students. <em>I stand out, thus I am alone<\/em>. When others read my work, they either alienated me because they were envious or because they thought I was a crazy-obsessed nerd-bitch, or maybe both.<\/li>\n<li>My point of argumentation is often somewhat&#8230; new, or at least unusual. I often disagree with the &#8222;common&#8220; point of view on a subject. I fear others might disagree and\/or cannot intelectually follow my argumentation. I work hard on making all my argumentations bulletproof, but <em>this still won&#8217;t protect me<\/em> from trolling, envy, and blunt stupidity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Put all those points together, and what have you got? The hermit. It&#8217;s all about feedback, I guess. The presentations weren&#8217;t as good as my papers, but at least I got some kind of instant reaction, so I felt pretty good about that. I also had the feeling I could work with the remarks, like it really helped me improving (when in reality, it never really did). Whereas with the papers, it was all me.\u00a0I could only &#8222;talk&#8220; with my books, and those books won&#8217;t give me any support or points to work with. I also <em>knew<\/em> the moment I sent the paper to the prof: &#8222;well, <em>again<\/em> an exceptionally good paper, yawn&#8230;&#8220;. Because I already knew my arguments were bulletproof, I worked hard on crosschecking every statement, I put a lot of work into detail, I tried making the paper layout beautiful and easy to read, and before I was not 200% satiesfied, I would just <em>not hand in that paper<\/em>&#8211; so the moment I did know it was ready to hand in, everything below very good was just not to be expected. The presentations on the other hand, were always a rollercoaster-ride, I never knew what kind of reaction I would get. Secretly, I might have enjoyed that thrill.<br \/>\nFor the future,<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I should learn how to further enjoy the quiet work alone, and how to genuinely praise myself <em>before<\/em> I hand in that paper: I want to work on how to be proud of my <em>hard work<\/em> and not only be proud of the <em>result<\/em> that hard work is producing.<\/li>\n<li>I should stop putting myself down for working slow, because it obviously <em>does not matter<\/em> in the long run. It&#8217;s perfect I&#8217;m doing <em>something<\/em>, and I don&#8217;t want to see myself in a race for grades. This is about improving myself, not grades. <em>I&#8217;m working fine the way I do. <\/em>I&#8217;m successful on long-term projects.<em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/li>\n<li>I also should accept I am 100% introvert, no matter how much I act and try to convince myself from other. It&#8217;s just no use fighting myself, and I should focus on working how to improve my <em>real<\/em> strenghts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For the sake of learning from old mistakes and also some selfsupport, I printed out all my old presentations, papers, and everything that either went on print or got a mark or feedback of some sort. I was quite astonished I only wrote 8 papers- with 7 papers in 3 years (2009-2012)- and held at &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/2013\/04\/05\/resumee\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">\u201eResumee\/ my scientific work\u201c<\/span> weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=437"}],"version-history":[{"count":40,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":452,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437\/revisions\/452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/userblogs.fu-berlin.de\/sonia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}